Skip to content

Solutions · For QA engineers

You review.
It retypes.

The job was never data entry. QAMind drafts the cases, writes the scripts and keeps the run history — you do the part that needs a QA brain: judgement.

A working week

Same week. Different job.

MonRead the PRD twice. Open the spreadsheet. Start typing test steps.
TueStill typing test steps. Feature area 1 of 4.
WedCopy-paste selectors into a Playwright file. Half of them are stale.
ThuRe-run the suite three times to see if checkout is 'really' failing.
FriPaste screenshots into a bug report. Nobody can reproduce it.

What does the lifting

The parts built for you.

Drafts, not blank pages

Structured cases from any spec — title, steps, expected result, priority, requirement ID. All editable, nothing final until you approve it.

An approval workflow that means it

Draft → Ready → Approved. Only approved cases feed script generation, so nothing half-reviewed becomes automation.

Recordings as ground truth

The Chrome extension captures real clicks and inputs. Cases and selectors come from what actually happened in the app.

Flaky tests, named

The analytics leaderboard surfaces slow, inconsistent cases from run history — so you stop re-running and start fixing.

16 case types

Functional, boundary, negative, exploratory, accessibility and more — the taxonomy is built in, not bolted on in a tags column.

Import the past, export anywhere

Bring cases in from .csv, .xlsx or .json. Send reports out as Excel, CSV, PDF or Word when someone upstream asks.

Spend your week breaking things, not transcribing them.